1983 Abarth A 112 vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1983 Abarth A 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1983 Abarth A 112.
Because 1968 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Abarth A 112 | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3390 mm |