1983 Abarth A 112 vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 760 kg more than 1983 Abarth A 112.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Ford Econovan has automatic transmission and 1983 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1983 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Econovan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Abarth A 112 | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1983 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |