1983 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alfa Romeo 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alfa Romeo 33 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1983 Alfa Romeo 33. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Alfa Romeo 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Alfa Romeo 33. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Alfa Romeo 33.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo 33 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 33 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1350 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.2 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 132 L |