1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | Alfa 6 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |