1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Alfasud | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3390 mm |
