1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Alfasud | 62 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |
