1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud weights approximately 204 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | DAF |
Model | Alfasud | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 33 L |