1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (104 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 102 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Alfasud | Midge |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |