1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 2,393 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta.
Because 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Alfetta | 626 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |