1983 Alfa Romeo Arna vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna has manual transmission. 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Alfa Romeo Arna | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Arna | 62 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1186 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3310 mm |
