1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint vs. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk
To start off, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk weights approximately 766 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint.
Because 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint. (133 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint | 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Pontiac |
Model | Sprint | Firehawk |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 464 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 54 L |