1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 254 more horse power than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint. (133 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Alfa Romeo Sprint | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | Sprint | Commodore |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |