1983 Alpine A 310 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alpine A 310 would be higher. Both 1983 Alpine A 310 and 2005 Nissan Hardbody are equipped with a 2,663 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Alpine A 310. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1983 Alpine A 310. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 515 kg more than 1983 Alpine A 310. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Alpine A 310. (208 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Alpine A 310 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Alpine | Nissan |
| Model | A 310 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 208 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 82 L |
