1983 Audi 80 vs. 1956 GAZ M-20
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi 80 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1983 Audi 80.
Because 1956 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi 80 (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1983 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 1956 GAZ M-20 | |
Make | Audi | GAZ |
Model | 80 | M-20 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |