1983 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi 80 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1983 Audi 80.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi 80 (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 80 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |