1983 Audi 80 vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi 80 (90 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Because 1965 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi 80 (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1983 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | 80 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |