1983 Audi 80 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi 80 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 340 kg more than 1983 Audi 80.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi 80 (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1983 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi 80 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 80 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
