1983 Audi 80 vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 75 kg more than 1983 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Lotus Eclat (190 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1974 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 80 | Eclat |
Year Released | 1983 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 67 L |