1983 Audi 80 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi 80 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi 80 (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 80 | 66 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |