1983 Audi 80 vs. 1986 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 581 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Audi 80 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi 80 | 1986 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 80 | XJR |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 6499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 671 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 90 L |
