1983 Audi 80 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,295 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 870 kg more than 1983 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (225 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | 80 | Rexton |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2295 cc |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |