1983 Audi 80 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 970 kg more than 1983 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi 80 | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | 80 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2874 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |
