1983 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 802 kg more than 1983 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 2006 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | STS |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 3563 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1782 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 66 L |