1983 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80.
Because 2006 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 90 L |