1983 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2009 Lotus Exige is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Exige is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Exige (257 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80.
Because 2009 Lotus Exige is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lotus Exige. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Exige (236 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi 80 | 2009 Lotus Exige | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | 80 | Exige |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 257 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 44 L |
