1983 Audi 80 vs. 2009 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 1104 kg more than 1983 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Stavic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Stavic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80. 2009 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1983 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1983 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi 80 | 2009 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | 80 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2034 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |
