1983 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,231 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2231 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 16.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |