1983 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (238 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 80 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 410 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |