1983 Audi UR vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1983 Audi UR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi UR (198 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1983 Audi UR.
Because 1983 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi UR. (270 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi UR | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | UR | 62 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 79 L |