1983 Audi UR vs. 1969 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1983 Audi UR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Audi UR. (198 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 755 kg more than 1983 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi UR | 1969 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | UR | DeVille |
Year Released | 1983 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 82 L |