1983 Audi UR vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1983 Audi UR. (198 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi UR.
Because 1983 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi UR. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi UR | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | UR | Etna |
Year Released | 1983 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2520 mm |