1983 Audi UR vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1983 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi UR (198 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Audi UR weights approximately 92 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi UR (270 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1983 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1983 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1983 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi UR | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Equator |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3260 mm |