1983 Audi UR vs. 2001 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi UR would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi UR (198 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1983 Audi UR.
Because 1983 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi UR. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi UR | 2001 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Econoline |
Year Released | 1983 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3510 mm |