1983 Audi UR vs. 2002 Xedos 9
To start off, 2002 Xedos 9 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi UR (198 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2002 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Xedos 9 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1983 Audi UR.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Audi UR (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1983 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi UR | 2002 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Audi | Xedos |
| Model | UR | 9 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |
