1983 Audi UR vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi UR would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Audi UR. (198 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi UR.
Because 1983 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi UR. (270 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Audi UR | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | UR | UTE |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
