1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1952 Triumph TR2

To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Triumph TR2 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Triumph TR2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph TR2 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph TR2 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Triumph TR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Allegro 1952 Triumph TR2
Make Austin Triumph
Model Allegro TR2
Year Released 1983 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 43 HP 90 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 3840 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1420 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2250 mm