1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1955 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Maserati A6G weights approximately 250 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1955 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | Allegro | A6G |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
