1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1325 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1983 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1983 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | 62 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3310 mm |
