1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1961 Jaguar E-Type

To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 436 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar E-Type (353 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Allegro 1961 Jaguar E-Type
Make Austin Jaguar
Model Allegro E-Type
Year Released 1983 1961
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 3781 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 43 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 106 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1236 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2440 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]