1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 512 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | 62 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
