1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1964 Honda S600
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Honda S600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Honda S600 would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Honda S600 (54 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Honda S600 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Austin Allegro weights approximately 70 kg more than 1964 Honda S600.
Because 1964 Honda S600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Honda S600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1964 Honda S600 | |
| Make | Austin | Honda |
| Model | Allegro | S600 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
