1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Austin | Lotus |
| Model | Allegro | Elan |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1430 mm |
