1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1966 Mercury Comet

To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro.

Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Allegro 1966 Mercury Comet
Make Austin Mercury
Model Allegro Comet
Year Released 1983 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 3279 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 43 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2950 mm