1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | Calais |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
