1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 110 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Allegro | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Allegro | Colt |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |