1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1981 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1983 Austin Allegro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. Both 1983 Austin Allegro and 1981 Austin Allegro are equipped with a 998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Austin Allegro (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 70 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1981 Austin Allegro | |
| Make | Austin | Austin |
| Model | Allegro | Allegro |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 70 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 64.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
