1983 Austin Allegro vs. 1995 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 905 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 1995 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1950 mm |
