1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 712 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Forester (186 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Allegro | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Austin | Subaru |
Model | Allegro | Forester |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |