1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Toyota MR2

To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota MR2 (138 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota MR2 (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Allegro 2004 Toyota MR2
Make Austin Toyota
Model Allegro MR2
Year Released 1983 2004
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 998 cc 1794 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 43 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 91.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1250 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2610 mm