1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 980 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Allegro | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Allegro | Tundra |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3270 mm |